|
WHAT IS COMPARISON/CONTRAST?
Comparison/contrast essays measure similarities and differences
between two subjects.
Sportswriters compare the teams playing in the Super Bowl.
Stockbrokers contrast investment strategies. Medical journals
compare therapy methods. Textbooks use comparison to explain
related theories and methods. Consumer Reports examines competing
products. Essay exams often ask students to compare authors,
historical events, political figures, or scientific techniques.
GOALS: TO INFORM OR PERSUADE
Comparisons serve two purposes: to explain differences between
subjects or to
persuade readers that one subject is superior others. You
can think of informative comparisons as pairs of definitions
or descriptions. Informative comparisons often serve to distinguish
differences between commonly confused items:
| induction/deduction |
psychologists/psychiatrists |
| slander/libel |
opthalmology/optometry |
| felony/misdemeanor |
viral infections/bacterial infections |
* Informative comparisons frequently use definition,
example, and description to establish similarities and differences.
* Informative comparisons generally do not recommend one item
as being better than other.
Persuasive comparisons recommend one subject as being superior
to another. You might argue that film has higher quality than
videotape or that Word is easier to use than WordPerfect.
Commercials often demonstrate how one product is better or
cheaper than other brands. Politicians use comparison and
contrast to demonstrate that their policies or positions are
superior to those advocated by their opponents.
* The thesis of persuasive comparisons is very clear -- one
subject is superior or more desirable than others.
* Persuasive comparisons rely heavily on critical thinking.
In persuading readers to accept that one subject is superior,
you must present convincing evidence.
Consider the kind of proof your readers would demand before
accepting your recommendations.
SELECTING TOPICS FOR COMPARISON/CONTRAST
The items you select must have some common elements. You can
easily compare two sports cars, but there is little sense
in comparing a Corvette to a minivan. You might compare a
house or condo in the same price range. But comparing a low
income apartment and a penthouse makes little sense.
* Your comparison should avoid commenting on obvious differences.
* Use critical thinking and prewriting to move beyond superficial
distinctions to provide insights into your subject most readers
may have never considered.
If your instructor does not assign a topic, you might consider
one of the following items. Select a subject, then explore
its possibilities using one or more prewriting strategies:
your father's and mother's attitude about success, abortion,
etc.
high school and college instructors
your best and worst bosses
your best and worst apartment
two methods of losing weight, investing money, learning to
dance, etc.
buying or leasing a car
two popular bands
two athletes, coaches, or teams
two talk shows, soap operas, or news programs
network and cable television
male and female attitudes about marriage, money, sexual harassment,
etc.
religion vs. cults
limited and full partnerships
two computer programs
commuting vs. living on campus
Republican and Democratic solutions to a social problem
past and current fads, customs, patterns of behavior
American attitudes toward money, sex, marriage, success and
those of another culture
two methods of punishing criminals
two popular restaurants, bars, health clubs, coffee shops,
etc.
GETTING STARTED
Developing a topic for writing a comparison paper can be difficult.
You may find yourself with a tangle of ideas and observations.
There are a few strategies you can use to make your prewriting
and planning more profitable and less frustrating:
1. Clearly identify the subjects you are writing about. Make
sure they are appropriate and have enough points of commonality
for a meaningful comparison.
2. Draw a line down the center of your page. Write names of
the subjects on the left and right. Briefly describe each
subject.
3. Jot down as many ideas as you can about each subject. You
may find yourself returning to the list to make changes.
4. Check the lists for points of similarity or contrast. Delete
needless data.
5. Examine your notes and narrow the focus of your paper.
Because you may be addressing two subjects in a five hundred
word essay instead of one, it is important to refine your
topic:
New York and Los Angeles
NY and LA lifestyles
NY and LA cuisine
British and American education
British and American colleges
British and American college admission standards
ORGANIZING COMPARISON
There are two basic methods of organizing a comparison paper
-- subject
by subject and point by point.
SUBJECT BY SUBJECT
The easiest way to organize a comparison paper is to simply
divide it into two parts. After an introductory paragraph,
fully discuss the first subject without mentioning the second.
Then in the latter half of the paper, explain the second
subject, comparing its likenesses and differences to the first:
DIESEL AND GASOLINE ENGINES
INTRODUCTION:
Overview of two engines used in motor vehicles
DIESEL ENGINES
GASOLINE ENGINES
CONCLUSION:
Final observations or recommendations
* The subject by subject method is best suited for short papers
involving few
technical points or statistics.
* The subject by subject method is best suited to short papers.
A long paper would be awkward to read if divided into two
parts. The information about fuel efficiency might be on page
5 for diesel engines and on page 11 for gasoline engines.
POINT BY POINT
For longer and more technical papers, it may be better to
compare the two subjects on a range of issues. Instead of
dividing the paper into two sections, you might organize your
make by making a series of comparisons on
a list of subtopics:
DIESEL AND GASOLINE ENGINES
INTRODUCTION
Overview of two engines used in motor vehicles
HISTORY AND DESCRIPTION
Diesel
Gasoline
COMBUSTION PROCESS
Diesel
Gasoline
FUEL EFFICIENCY
Diesel
Gasoline
POLLUTION
Diesel
Gasoline
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS
Diesel
Gasoline
CONCLUSION
Final observations or recommendations
* The object by object method is useful for comparing technical
data. In this form prices, facts, statistics, and specifications
can be placed side by side for easy reference.
* The object-by-object method is suited to addressing multiple
readers. Specialized information is isolated in one section
covering both subjects, so that an accountant can quickly
locate financial information and a marketing
director can easily find sales data.
* The object-by-object method is useful for longer papers.
STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING COMPARISON
AVOID COMPARING
APPLES AND ORANGES
In selecting topics and developing papers, make sure that
your comparisons are valid.
Make sure that your essay does more than draw on superficial
similarities and differences.
USE CRITICAL THINKING TO REVIEW POINTS OF COMPARISON
Comparisons are only valid objectively selects points
of comparison. You can easily create a biased comparison by
only selecting those points of comparison that favor a particular
subject. You can demonstrate that nuclear energy is superior
than solar
power if you do not consider atomic energy's major drawbacks
-- radioactive waste and reactor accidents.
DEFINE CRITICAL TERMS
Readers can only understand your comparison if terms
are carefully defined. Make sure that any sources you use
to gather information use the same definitions. You cannot
accurately compare two treatment programs for alcoholism if
they use different definitions for the disease and use different
standards for measuring recovery.
COMPARISON CHECKLIST
BEFORE SUBMITTING YOUR PAPER, REVIEW
THESE POINTS
1. Have you limited your topic?
2. Do you have a clearly defined goal -- to explain differences
or make a recommendation?
3. Is the thesis clearly stated so that readers can highlight
it for easy reference?
4. Have you selected the right method for organizing your paper?
5. Are transitions clear? Do you make use of paragraph breaks
and other signals to prevent readers from becoming confused?
6. READ YOUR PAPER ALOUD. How does it sound? Do any sections
need expansion? Are there irrelevant details to delete or
awkward passages needing revision?
|